Homosexuality is a natural sexual orientation for the same sex in
contrast with the 95% of the population which is Heterosexual
irrespective of the culture, race or religion. Irrespective, there is a
common foundation of relationship, love and mutual support. There is no
basis of condemning gays just account of same sex activity in the bible,
for these actions were done out of religious practices, or out of sexual
torture and subjugation, and not same sex love and affection. If we were
to be consistent, we would also have condemned heterosexuality on
account of rape between man and woman.
With reference in Genesis 19, used by many to condemn gays, there is no
mention that all the people of Sodom were men, nor that all of these men
were gays. This would be improbable as usually 95% of the population
would be straight in any society and typically 50% women. Where were all
the women in Sodom? Furthermore, Sodom would not have grown if they were
all men, and Lot with his wife and daughters would have found it
difficult to integrate. Hence, the scenario painted is not biblical but
contrived to support a pre-conceived argument. Sodom may not have been
much different from the rich and wealthy cities of the world today.
What is known about Sodom was that it was a region famous for its
worship fertility gods, such as Baal/Ashtoreth. The worship practices
were sex orgies, with worshippers having sex with the priests and
priestesses. When the bible talks about abomination, it is not same sex
marriage or orientation, it is religious idol worship especially
involving sex and human sacrifices that was an abomination to God.
Sex can have such a spiritual impact that through faith based sexual
orgies of the Canaanite goddess Ashtoreth, the people of Sodom were
possessed by the spirit behind it to attack the angels and to rape them.
It is not only about sexual abuse but demon procession. They were not
gays nor were motivated by same sex orientation and love to have sex
with the angels. It was pure sexual abuse with demonic ferocity and
hate. The Angels were obvious targets because they were from God. Our
righteousness can be tainted through sex when there is a religious
element behind it or if the person we had sex with is dedicated wholly
to a particular deity.
The power of Sex to join two entities thus soling our righteousness is
further emphasized in 1 Cor 6:16 that when the straight men have sex
with the female temple prostitute they are united with her. The two
flesh becomes one. As the men were having sex with the temple
prostitutes were posessed by the spiritual entity, we are in fact having
sex with the spirit behind it. As we are the temple of the Holy Spirit
(1 Cor 6:19), on the account that we are paid by Christ death at the
Cross, the unclean shall not be joined with what is clean.
The first mention of Sodom was in Gen 13:13, “now
the people of Sodom were wicked, great sinners against the Lord”, and
then in Gen 14:21, “The King of Sodom said to Abraham, “Give me the
persons, but take the good for yourself”. Later in Gen 18:20, “then the
Lord said “How great is the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah and how
very grace their sin. I must go down ….”. If Sodom were just gay men
happily involved in same sex orgies day and night, there would obviously
be no complaint since they were willing parties. However, when we refer
back to Gen 14:21, a picture begin to emerge that Sodom was involved in
slavery of both men and women and they were crying out to God for they
were cruelly abused and treated and the men were likely raped by their
captors in order to humiliate and subjugate them. Therefore, the
wickedness was how they have treated and abused others. Ezekiel 16:49,
the prophet Ezekiel did not mention homosexuality as the sin rather
pride and the prosperity gain through the injustice against the poor and
needy. This was consistent with why
Lot camped there in the first place, attracted to its power and wealth
alas built on the sufferings of others. Lot's wife looked back at the
City of Sodom still longing for its glitter and wealth, and certainly
not after the gay men!
When God appeared to Abraham and Sarah in Gen 18, Abraham immediately
bowed down to the ground, and his first words were in Gen 18:3, “My
Lord, if ….”. How would Abraham have known that these were heavenly
beings even God Himself? In Gen 19, almost exactly the same thing
happened to Lot. He bowed his face down to the ground, and said in Gen
19:2, “Please, my Lords ….”. It is highly unlikely that in any culture,
we would bow down to strangers and call them “Lords” on account of
hospitality. Rather, the men or angels or the Lord, must have had an
incredible aura or persona that went with them that would have hinted
their heavenly origins. That was why there was such a commotion and
all the towns people when to Lot’s home when the news spread that they
were residing there.
The people of Sodom were so proud of their prosperity and power that in
their pride they even tried to extend their dominion over the heavenly
angels, in essence, they were challenging heaven itself. Raping the
men/angels in their culture, would signify their cities total dominion
over the angels in addition to sexual abuse. That was why, they were not
interested in Lot’s daughters. Firstly, they were obviously not gay
since they were offered the daughters, and secondly there was nothing to
prove if they had raped the daughters. Can a city be so proud of their
wealth and power and their dominion over others, that even when God
visited the city, they wanted to rape Him to declare their lordship over
the heavens?
In Mat
10:11, Jesus made a reference Sodom saying that it would be more
tolerable for the people of Sodom on judgment day rather the towns that
had rejected the mission of the twelve sent out to the people of Israel.
If Sodom had been a gay city as claimed by mainstream Christianity,
surely it was more wicked that the towns in Israel made up by straight
people. Yet, it was the towns that had rejected Jesus that will suffer
more. The issue here was never about sexual orientation, for both cities
were predominantly straight. It was because Jesus was made flesh,
revealed Himself fully as the Son of God, and not in the form of an
Angel, and this was a far greater revelation that the people of Sodom
ever had.
They only had seen the Angels and rejected their
message of salvation, but the towns had rejected God Himself in person.
The story in Sodom has a parallel in Judges 19:22-26 where in the city
of Gibeah, the tribe of Benjamin, the men of the city said “Bring out
the man who came into your house, so that we may have intercourse with
him”. The master of the house pleaded for the men of the city not to do
such a wicked thing, but in the same breath offered his own virgin
daughter and the man’s concubine so that they can rape and abused them.
This parallel incident confirms that the men of the city were obviously
not gays as they would not have been interested in the women, but
secondly emphasized why it was so much more wicked for them to rape the
man rather than the woman because the man has a higher standing than the
woman, and raping the man in the same way as the man would rape the
woman would essentially reduced him to the status of a woman. There was
less of an issue of the man raping the woman because the man was higher
in the patriarchal order.
Unlike Sodom, the story of the mass rape in Judges 19:22 is not
mentioned in Jude or 2 Peter or elsewhere because Sodom was set in the
historical context where angels were having sex with human beings
producing powerful beings and this type of sex was considered as utmost
wicked and very unnatural act. Secondly, the angels were heavenly beings
having a higher status than man whilst the woman was in a lower pecking
order in society. Thirdly, Jewish apostles in the New Testament would
not have wanted to repeat the story of a real disgrace within their own
nation for it had started a civil war. Sodom and the angels were not
related to Israel.
There are parallel stories into our modern times.
In the case of the brutality by New
York Police Officers in June 1999 against Abner Louima, there was
torture and anal rape by the Police officers who were definitely not gay
and were doing it to teach the victim a lesson rather than same sex
love. The forced rape using a stick resulted in severe injuries
including a torn rectum and a bladder. The defense tried to frame it as
being done as a separate occasion of consensual same sex love. The
persecution said this suggestion was “'despicable and, frankly, stupid….
It was insulting to you and it was insulting to us and it was insulting
and offensive to Abner Louima,'' the persecution told the jury.
Perhaps, the reply by the persecution best sums up how the GLBT people
have been framed by many in the story of Sodom.
Ultimately the people of Sodom were abusing and sacrificing the innocent
for the sake of their religious faith worship and their theology. We may
not be much different, announcing that "God loves you", and the next
moment sacrificing gays with our twist and turns of false rethoric and
vicious condemnation from the pulpit so that our dogmatic theology makes
sense to us. We fear that the natural existence of Gays will
desconstruct our notion of bible infalibility. Therefore, we keep
sacrificing gays not that they are any greater sinners than us, but so
that we can explain our theology and the bible. Will God judge us just
as He had judged Sodom for the cries of the people they abused even
reached the heavens. Our hypocrisy only further condemns us.
|